首页> 外文OA文献 >Analisis Ketidakharmonisan antara PPSAK No. 13, 16, dan 19 dengan UU No. 36 Tahun 2008 dan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. 79/PMK 03/2008 Mengenai Revaluasi Aset Tetap, Properti Investasi, dan Aset Tak Berwujud
【2h】

Analisis Ketidakharmonisan antara PPSAK No. 13, 16, dan 19 dengan UU No. 36 Tahun 2008 dan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. 79/PMK 03/2008 Mengenai Revaluasi Aset Tetap, Properti Investasi, dan Aset Tak Berwujud

机译:PPSAK号之间的不和谐分析13、16和19号法2008年第36号法令和财政部长79 / PMK 03/2008关于固定资产,投资物业和无形资产的重估

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to analyze disharmony between SFAS No. 13, 16, and 19 which are adopted from Internatonal Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS 2009) and Law no. 36 of 2008 and Regulation of the Minister of Finance No. 79/PMK 03/2008 about the Revaluation of Fixed Assets, Investment Property, and Intangible Assets. The Authors use descriptive analysis method in this paper. The analysis showed that (1) There are no major obstacles in implementing the revaluation model under SFAS No. 13 and 19 with the tax regulation, (2) The application of SFAS No. 16 is not in line with the Law No. 36 of 2008 and Regulation of the Minister of Finance No. 79/PMK 03/2008, (3) There are 7 dysharmony between SFAS No. 16 with the Regulation of the Minister of Finance No. 79/PMK 03/2008 with the level of problem: 3 are major, 3 are medium, and 1 is minor. Disharmony can cause companies reluctant to report their assets at fair value as required under the revaluation model. Though the information of assets which is measured by fair value is needed by investors and creditors in their economic decision-making. Therefore, the author suggesting the application of revaluation model is separated between fiscal and commercial financial reporting. Considering the purpose of SFAS and Law No. 36 of 2008 and Regulation of the Minister of Finance No.79/PMK 03/2008 basically different, the author recommendation can be considered by regulators.
机译:本文旨在分析国际财务报告准则(IFRS 2009)采用的SFAS第13、16和19号之间的不协调。关于固定资产,投资物业和无形资产重估的2008年第36号法律和财政部长条例第79 / PMK 03/2008号。作者使用描述性分析方法。分析表明:(1)在税法中实施SFAS第13号和第19号中的重估模型没有主要障碍,(2)SFAS第16号的应用不符合税法第36号。 2008年与财政部长条例第79 / PMK 03/2008号,(3)SFAS第16号与财政部长条例第79 / PMK 03/2008号之间存在7个失调:3个为主要,3个为中等,1个为次要。不协调会导致公司不愿按照重估模型要求以公允价值报告其资产。尽管投资者和债权人在经济决策中需要以公允价值计量的资产信息。因此,笔者建议重估模型的应用在财政和商业财务报告之间是分开的。考虑到SFAS的目的和2008年第36号法律的目的以及财政部长第79 / PMK 03/2008号法规的根本不同,监管机构可以考虑作者的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kuang, Tan Ming;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ID
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号